Because the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is usually justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is put in its place.
In that sense, case regulation differs from just one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Big apple would not be decided using case regulation from California. As a substitute, The big apple courts will assess the issue counting on binding precedent . If no previous decisions within the issue exist, New York courts may possibly have a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors for example how previous the decision is as well as the closeness to the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight given to any reported judgment may possibly rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
If you find an error within the articles of a published opinion (such as a misspelled name or simply a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of here Decisions. TVW
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is properly-settled that even though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the merit of the many qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these suitable candidates who're found to get most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored because of the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part with the respondent department.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is a mandatory need in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation involves that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case law by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may possibly transpire several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement in the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced via the findings from the Impugned order, after recording of evidence from the respective parties. Read more